Evidence that God exists

[Kyuuketsuki]

So... Gold & jewel encrusted Detroit. I would say that it could happen, that God could do it, but God would also make it explainable by science. To my mind, this is entirely consistent with what the Bible says. Proof I think is on my side.

I'm sorry if you deem this to be insulting but you (and I do mean you) have to be raising some of wackiest arguments in support of your chosen deity that I have ever seen. In essence there is no proof and that, that that is exactly what it would do if it were real, supports your god? That's insane!

He can of course also do anything at all, including things that the Bible says he's already done, plus infinitely more. He is neither incapable nor unwilling. He is observed to be following this rule. It would be inconsistent if he did not.

Nothing but fairy tale gobbledegook.

Yes absolutely God is constantly revealing himself. He speaks directly but not in any way that would leave you in no doubt that he exists, because that wouldn't be in line with scripture. You wouldn't need faith. If he did, then the Bible would need to be thrown away and a new religion created. That goes for most if not all other religions too. Monotonously it follows the logic.

Strange then that no one can verify such revelations. Logic? There is none that I can see in your arguments.

I don't recall, does it say in the Bible that some people who saw Jesus resurrected nevertheless doubted it?

Thomas, one of Jesus' main men, doubted it.

Now let me get this straight. You're telling me what Christianity is? Orthadoxy.. you talking Catholicism? Dull dishwater? I take it you have a need for chastisement and threats of hell & high water. It doent surprise me that you truly fear the real thing, but I think it beneath you to level that at me. I concede no ground at all. You have concluded that I have, but I have countered every notion.

Whilst Catholicism (n some ways) s one of the "worst" (at times near fundamentalist I feel) it is somehow simultaneously one of the better mainstream religions in that at least it embraces and mostly even encourages independent scientific thought (OK, the recent Pope seems to have reoriented slightly but there you go.

You concede no ground because your arguments fly in the face of any real logic and therefore cannot (logically) be dealt with apart from to point out how daft some of your arguments are.

Of course, since you've now put at least two people on ignore (Mark you really need to watch out for this guy), one wonders if you actually know how to debate rationally at all?

Kyu