For those who want proof of the exodus

[GrandizerII]

I won't waste my time trying to illustrate the truth of what I said since it's clear that you can't or won't accept any examples. But let me say this: The Old and New Testaments of the Bible may have all sorts of problems that need to be sorted out if one is to be a believer, but archaeology isn't among them. If anything, the evidence in the ground suggests that the Bible is surprisingly reliable with regard to these things.

Whether that accuracy supports its supernatural claims is another matter, of course.

I never claimed that the Bible does not contain some archaeological (and historical) accuracies.

The problem is, it contains so many inaccuracies.

That's a key flaw with athrock's way of reasoning in this thread. Athrock seems to only focus on supporting evidence but ignores negating evidence.