(January 12, 2016 at 1:08 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(January 12, 2016 at 1:04 pm)athrock Wrote: Um...the bush wasn't talking. The bush was burning but not being consumed. God was talking.Oh..are those the -factual- details of the event? Bit like the flood or the deluge huh? Are you sure you wouldn't like to allow that the author got it wrong...upfront this time?
Your parents never took you to Sunday School, did they?
Quote:Hey, this is kinda simple really...the book makes claims that either can or cannot be verified. I'm not impressed by the claims of those who think they have located the Ark, okay?Yeah, we know, you were trolling, it's okay - you've already explained.
Quote:But Mahoney made a though-provoking film, and I'm trying to understand the factual bases for both what he has said and why he may be wrong.No, not really, because you're lying through your teeth again.
Thus far, the folks active in this thread haven't impressed me with their "reasoning" as to why the Egyptian timeline is sacrosanct or why Mahoney is in error.
But, if Mahoney has fabricated any of his story or made an obvious error, then I would be quick to let Drich know that, too.
Fair?
Oh...it just hit me.
You USED to be a believer, didn't you?