(January 14, 2016 at 1:34 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: [quote='Drich' pid='1173191' dateline='1452791556']
This is not true.
Your framing these acts through the lens of modern morality. from your current vantage point you can say A was never ok or b always was despite what the people who live in a society thought 50 years ago.
We know this because 50 years ago their were laws on the book identifying homosexuality as being a criminal offense, therefore an immoral act in most states. where as now it is legal for gays to get married. Their was a paradigm shift in morality concerning homosexuality in this country.
If your going to be a self-righteous douche and claim the high ground while ignoring history, I'd like you to go ahead and list all of the other 'morally right' things society currently deems immoral/illegal. Where does underage sex, incest, and sex with animals rank in your version of 'always been moral?' What if all parties give their consent? After all you did say:
Quote:I think most of us don't care one way or another about incest.google 'donkey show'
Animals cannot give consent.

Quote:Children can, but it wouldn't be considered informed consent since children really don't understand/grasp things (even when they think they do). That's why we don't let them vote, make important financial decisions, etc.says pop culture currently. What happens in 10 years when 100 studies come out that contradict your 'old way of thinking.' People like you have been conditioned to accept 'proof' in a given format without question. what if society decides to place 'proof' in that format so that generation has unfettered access to the next? where is morality then? won't the same arguments you use to defend incest or homosexuality be used to defend sex with children? what if the find a pedophile gene? will it be wrong to imprison someone who 'can't help what their genitals want?'
Quote:Regarding biblical slavery, your entire "It still happens today and you condone it!" show is merely a transparent way to equivocate. If we condone slavery in the 21st century, then we have no right to criticize the slavery mentioned in the bible. Except, we don't actively condone it. It's a fact of life that, given how globalized capitalism works, individual people cannot do much about it because, as you say, our entire culture is built upon cheaply produced goods. And we have no viable second option.


Ok, it would be one thing to say I don't know of any other way to live and if you are not Amish you'd be telling the truth.. But here's the problem sport: You are LIVING ON THE BACKS OF SLAVES And Rather Than Acknowledge It You Change Their Job Titles So You Can Pretend To Be Righteous!!! Rather than Tell the TRUTH and Accept your Role so We Can Demand High Profit companies like Nike to Take the 150.00 Profit they make off a single pair of shoes they sell us and double a slave's wage from 1.25 a day to 3.00...
How do you not understand by pretend to be 'moral' by denouncing all slavery and then ignore how slavery impacts your life for the better you are making things worse for modern slaves than what was going on 200 years ago to the 'black man?'
Quote:So, no, it's not that we accept (as in approve, morally support) slavery. It's that we're not in a position to change it much.So pretend it is not there, and crapping all over someone who not only admits their role in it, but demands you acknowledge your own role in modern slaver.. Is your ONLY Option?
This is no different than drinking or drugs or any other self destructive behavior outside of it having a major societal impact.. In that we must first collectively admit we have a problem before a solution can be found..
Your role your unwillingness to admit how much your life depends on modern slavery is the reason modern slaves have it worse than those who came before. think about it. We live better than kings ever did through out history. Even our poor working class have better access to food, medical, Mod cons, housing, protection from the elements and access to information. All of which is potentially available to modern slaves IF the self-righteous would simply own up to how their lives DEPEND on slavery.
Quote:You'll note, however, that there is a global push to improve working conditions and worker safety around the world.lol you didn't read the Nike articles did you?
Their is only a push for top tier companies. Raw material manufactures and food production are living/working in conditions that slaves did hundreds of years ago, but have gotten worse with all the new chemical treatments that they are now exposed to that they would not have been 100's of years ago.
Quote: The notion that one can beat their slave/employee is considered grossly immoral by most, and that's why we take issue with that particular portion of the bible.NIKE Factory Supervisors up until the last few years did this very thing!!! IT Only Changed When People Acknowledged what Nike was doing. Which is not Happening outside the big brands! This would change if people like you woke the f' up and stopped pretending to be better than the bible.
Your fav brand of running shoe tells you a different story! The bible put limitations on beatings, your shoe company did not have limits outside those the one doing the beating decided to place on himself.
Quote:As you noted with laws regarding homosexuality, morality is subjective and changes over time. And that's why we scoff at the idea of the bible being a font of objective morality. Because objective clearly morality doesn't exist. Morality is never static. It's, instead, based on ideas of equity and fairness, and those are always fluid.but again, Nike shows it is not out of your control if you accept responsibility!
So, it really doesn't matter if ancient Jews felt that it was okay to beat slaves so long as they didn't die. Generally speaking, we're beyond that in thought if not practice, and the practice is largely out of our control due to a variety of factors.