RE: Something to shake the very foundation of your lack of faith
January 16, 2016 at 7:04 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 7:07 am by SteelCurtain.)
Yes, when we cannot physically test something---because of sheer distance or because the technology to do so hasn't been invented--- we accept theories based on observations and proofs.
The reason that is a red herring is because your claim can be tested. Easily. We don't rely on a YouTube video when the claim can so easily be proved by the medical journal entry that would have followed.
Why is it again that you're still going on about dark matter instead of shutting me up with the scholarly article? I'll even link you directly to PubMed.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
It has a really useful search box there, too.
The reason that is a red herring is because your claim can be tested. Easily. We don't rely on a YouTube video when the claim can so easily be proved by the medical journal entry that would have followed.
Why is it again that you're still going on about dark matter instead of shutting me up with the scholarly article? I'll even link you directly to PubMed.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
It has a really useful search box there, too.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
