Why is Philosophy and Religion off the hook when it comes to evidence?
If I told you water holds memory, you'd say homeopathy is a pile of nonsense. And you'd be right. But Chopra speaks bollocks, which can easily be disproved and millions let him off the hook. Why?
If I told you water holds memory, you'd say homeopathy is a pile of nonsense. And you'd be right. But Chopra speaks bollocks, which can easily be disproved and millions let him off the hook. Why?