(January 17, 2016 at 4:28 am)yukapuka Wrote: yes expect what your claiming you cant even formally put it into a sentence let alone show some historical backing for it
First off, you would be wise to not counsel anyone else on their sentence structure. Your best sentences were plagiarized.
(January 17, 2016 at 4:28 am)yukapuka Wrote: and if it is so easy to access, show it and stop claiming it , because EVERY other history says otherwise
Man, it seems I've been requesting the very same to you for 20 pages now. If you can't "show it and stop claiming it" on the very impetus of this thread then why should anyone show you the same decency?
It also seems like you are ignoring me because you have no answer to my questions. That feels good. Being ignored in these threads while asking for the simplest thing is as close to proof that you have nothing as we're going to get. Aside from the fact that you're utterly full of shit.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
