(January 23, 2016 at 2:10 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:Are you asking which monument mentions Israeli slaves?(January 23, 2016 at 1:02 pm)Drich Wrote: This guy actually quotes and reads from . . . Momuments that Identify Israel/the Jews as slaves in Egypt.
Citation needed.
I'll have to watch the movie again, to get the name. I belive it was the son of Ramses the great who order this moument of the Great's history. It is a black tomb stone shape object that remains on site (not in a museum) found in the last 3/4 of the movie. I'll try and watch it again tonight for the name look it up and post a link.
(January 23, 2016 at 1:02 pm)Drich Wrote: Plus in the sand they find 25 to 30 other villages/towns that would support a slave population for the exodus..
Quote:And you wonder why I find there evidence weak and speculative? That 25 villages could have supported a large Semitic population is not evidence that they did support a Semitic population.No the movie points out of the known 25 most have not been excavated. but the one that have been were of the period and semetic. Tombs, tools and architecture point to a sematic people. remember at this point they were all Egyptians which is why they are not identified as Jews or Israelites. But Egyptians with a Semitic background.
Quote:They found "a house". Only their ad hoc interpretation makes it Joseph's house. If you can't see how much this is a product of them telling a story about it, you are blind. You are interpreting spin as fact because it fits what you want to believe.And the pyramids primary role was what? you do know that 'their' Ad hoc interpretation makes them tombs...
THATS WHAT ARCHEAOLOGY IS! It is men and women trying to put an entire social structure back in it's place in history from " broken bits to tatters and Rags" of the original civilization. someone comes up with some ad hoc explanation that best explains what 'evidence' their is and until someone can come up with something better or finds something better that 'ad hoc' explanation is law.