(January 24, 2016 at 3:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Are you so diluted that you do not know the difference between EVIDENCE and Commentary anymore?
Of course I do, stupid. (BTW, the word you are groping for is "deluded" not "diluted" you dumb fuck.)
Archaeology has evidence. You have a book of fairy tales. No matter how many holy-joes you trot out to say "GOD SAID" it does not overcome the actual evidence which is that your fucking bible is a pile of shit.
And you are an asshole. Read it or not. I doubt that you can comprehend real science because of your abject desire to believe that nonsense is true.
What do you think this discussion is about? I provided a source that lists/Compiles 1/2 a dozen primary sources in or that was found by Archaeological efforts that support the exodus... Now accept the evidence or not, your role if you are wanting to be apart of this discussion is not to provide unsupported 'commentary' that does not address the evidence, but only supports what you want to believe. That is just blind wanting. and empty effort/wishing my statement was not true.
Your task would be to address the primary and secondary source material by showing it was translated improperly, show that the material or source was flawed by providing better source material or even quote a commentary with quotations of/to other sources of evidence that are of or greater stock than what was listed.
_or you can correct grammar errors my spell check makes.. I'm sure your peers will credit you and your efforts in doing so, as being more valid than if you actually spoke on point, coherently and topically for once.