(January 26, 2016 at 5:11 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Do you really think in all of that I have failed to produce any of the evidence discussed?
All you've said is "watch the movie" ( imagine a plaintive voice of a 4 year old wanting a cookie.)
I watched it. It sucked balls. It is a wet dream for jesus freak assholes who want someone ( anyone ) to tell them that their bullshit is true.
It isn't. You're a moron for believing in it.
You didn't watch it you read a review of it. Or maybe you had it on while sleeping, because your representation of the facts the movie provides all seem second hand at best. Your focus on Rohl's book is also a big red flag that indicates you did not watch the movie. Rohl's book is only mentioned, as a way to tie the evidence which mainstream Egyptologists not only accept but the artifacts discoverers and caretakers are interviewed to give their accounts of the vetted artifacts. Rohls theory is introduced as an optional component/intentional variable to the actual evidence that is being ignored, or relabeled.