For those who want proof of the exodus

[Drich]

You didn't watch it you read a review of it. Or maybe you had it on while sleeping, because your representation of the facts the movie provides all seem second hand at best. Your focus on Rohl's book is also a big red flag that indicates you did not watch the movie. Rohl's book is only mentioned, as a way to tie the evidence which mainstream Egyptologists not only accept but the artifacts discoverers and caretakers are interviewed to give their accounts of the vetted artifacts. Rohls theory is introduced as an optional component/intentional variable to the actual evidence that is being ignored, or relabeled.

Now you are just a liar.  I watched the whole stupid fucking thing and it is as shitty as you are.  Rohl is not new, asswipe.  He's been peddling the same bullshit tale for 20 years and made no traction with anyone except asshole fundie morons.  Explains why you love his sorry ass.  But I did watch your stupid movie.  I simply found it amateurish and absurd.

Just like your fucking bible.

If you watched the movie how then is it that you assume that Rohl's theory is central to all the evidence presented? why do you keep returning to rohl? is that you tried and failed to explain anything else way? And also why do you keep quoting his book? the movie takes a different path that his theory per his book..

So again all of this evidence tells me you did watch the movie, didn't understand what you watch or far more likly watched a or read review, but most of your 'movie points' are on the extreme edge of topical relevance.