(February 3, 2016 at 9:56 am)Rhythm Wrote: That's great, you've had a lot to say about embarrassment but you still haven't told us how we're supposed to use it to make an inference as to the historicity of the contents. Which is frankly -all- that matters in the first place.
I told you many times, this is using principle of parsimony as well. You keep thinking deductive logic.
Also, your updated list of parsimony is silly. I don't think you're even trying to be serious.