(February 4, 2016 at 1:50 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(February 4, 2016 at 8:56 am)Little Rik Wrote: One of your many problems yog is that you tend to come to quick conclusions without first analyze
the issue properly.
Take this sentence from your link.
It say........(F1) The evolution of species demonstrates that development of the brain obtains a corresponding mental development............
Does this means that the development of the brain come come first and the mental development follow?
Of course not, there is no evidence that this is the case.
Seeing as that was never in contention, this point is irrelevant to whether you've been shown evidence that consciousness is in the brain. So what the fuck does this have to do with anything?
(February 4, 2016 at 8:56 am)Little Rik Wrote: In fact it make sense that this is not the case and that it may well be the opposite as the wish to evolve come before the matter is build.
A builder got the idea to build something so the idea come first and the building follow not the other way around.
One more demented point.
It say..........Brain damage destroys mental capacities..........
Obvious.
It would be like to say that a car accident hurt the driver.
What sort of reason is this?
It's called an inference. Understandably you haven't heard of it as all you know are stories and analogies.
(February 4, 2016 at 8:56 am)Little Rik Wrote: But let us come to more demented points.
It say...........If the mind could exist independently of the brain, why couldn’t the mind compensate for lost faculties when brain cells die after brain damage?
.........
Simple.
Because the mind is stuck inside the body-brain.
Just imagine you after an accident.
You are stuck inside your vehicle.
How the hell can you fix your damage vehicle by being stuck in it?
More stupid analogies. You have been given evidence that the consciousness is in the brain. If you believe something else, it doesn't mean you haven't been provided evidence. And that was the point.
(February 4, 2016 at 8:56 am)Little Rik Wrote: This guy who write all this crap has no idea of whatsoever how the whole system works
Still not relevant.
Did i ever say that the consciousness is not in the brain?
Once again you don't pay attention to what people write.
Time and time again i said that the consciousness is stuck inside the brain
until the body-brain last (to say that is dead).
After that the consciousness is disconnected from the dead body-brain
and live on independently.
The point however was whether the consciousness is a product of the brain as atheists
claim or the other way around as smart people that know how the system works say.
Capisci?
