RE: U.S. Presidents & The Natural-born-citizen Clause
February 5, 2016 at 5:21 pm
(This post was last modified: February 5, 2016 at 5:29 pm by Sterben.)
It should not be a matter of concern if a person was born in a different country, this clause is more of a "Keeping it in the family" issue. Big companies practice this all time passing down there company's to their spoiled children. There would be many qualified immigrants who have better educations then most Americans, think about it this way. Candid A: She has a PHD in political science from Oxford, no major legal trouble in her life, worked for many political organizations. served in the senate, was born and raised in mostly Germany; both parents German, has been an American citizen for 25 years and she's 44, she's fluent in Russian, German, French, and English. This candid does not have children nor married, she's an Atheist. Candid B: He's the son of a former senator and has been in legal trouble in his adult life, did not attend an elite school, served as a mayor, and a somewhat popular senator, he only speaks English, has been admitted to Rehab four times for his drinking problems, and parents born into in rich American families, he's married with three kids and is 54 years old.
What Candid would you win if the natural born clause was not in effect?
What Candid would you win if the natural born clause was not in effect?
