RE: U.S. Presidents & The Natural-born-citizen Clause
February 6, 2016 at 1:50 am
(This post was last modified: February 6, 2016 at 1:53 am by Sterben.)
(February 6, 2016 at 1:46 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:I know, I was agreeing with both of you. Sorry I forgot to put you in there was well. I was trying a grievance of mine in there as well.(February 6, 2016 at 12:59 am)Sterben Wrote: I agree with Mr. Hanky, when a person is 18 they are not ready for such responsibilities. The average male that is 25 has far more sense then an 18 year old does. I would want to add that a person under 25 has no business having children but, that would mean teaching about condoms and birth control pills, in 7th grade since the average age of sexual activity is much lower then it was once was. We can't go around preparing our children with the knowledge of safety, cause you know, it would be a bad thing for people to be able enjoy them selves in their teen years, and be able to not have have major problems when they exit those years. The way it should be is for a man or a woman is education first, placement in career since the first 10 years of your field is getting a solid footing in the company or field of choice, then around 35 to 40 children optional.(emphasis is mine)
Did you not get the fact that I was actually agreeing?!? I don't think those ages will be raised (except maybe for voting age), for the reasons I stated, but I agree they should be.