(February 7, 2016 at 7:12 am)robvalue Wrote: The evidence is that those aren't very specific statements. They aren't enough to identify an individual.
So, I take it there is nothing extra-biblical? OK, that's all I need to know. I'm aware the bible is a compilation of works, but to call those works independent is not something I'd agree with.
Aren't enough to identify an individual? What more do you want? That's just a sublist.
Matthew and Luke depend on Mark, but doesn't seem like they depend on each other. There's also Q as well. So the works are not all dependent on one another.
