(February 7, 2016 at 2:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(February 7, 2016 at 1:53 pm)Brian37 Wrote: No you made the claim, now it is time for you to prove, that your Catholic view of the bible is credible, and you need to do so with scientific evidence. If you cannot do that, then do the right thing, and admit the bible is not the correct way to view human behaviors.
I am quite sure you already accept that the Quran contains no scientific evidence that defends the need for a woman to wear a burka.
Don't hit and run. Prove that Catholic interpretation of gays is scientifically sound.
I can't prove that, and never claimed I could. However, I have had a personal experience that has been proof to me of God's existence, and of Catholicism specifically. Can I use this as proof for anyone else? No. Not unless they took my word for what I would say happened. I just know in my heart that it is true, and I'm ok with others not agreeing. I have 0 interest in trying to convert anyone here. Looks like you're looking for a fight, but you'll just have to go look somewhere else.
Right you cant prove it, and that should tell you something right there.
"Personal experience", yep heard that one too, not just from Catholics, but Baptists and Mormons and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists. Yes you can cling to something based on that. Now the issue on all topics, not just the topic of this thread is "so what".
And like most humans, you have no idea what selection bias and sample rate error are. And you don't understand that science does explain even to a neurological degree, that our species perceptions of reality are notoriously flawed.
