Yes but their ball was already dropped by default. They needed to provide evidence first.
They believe in God, they are arguing for God, they need to provide evidence.
And which is more bold positive claim anyway? Definitely FSM or definitely NO FSM? Despite the fact the 2nd is fallacious the first needs to be backed up first, right?
DEFINITELY NO FSM isn't as absurd and needing evidence as much as THE FSM DEFINITELY EXISTS.
EvF
They believe in God, they are arguing for God, they need to provide evidence.
And which is more bold positive claim anyway? Definitely FSM or definitely NO FSM? Despite the fact the 2nd is fallacious the first needs to be backed up first, right?
DEFINITELY NO FSM isn't as absurd and needing evidence as much as THE FSM DEFINITELY EXISTS.
EvF