(February 8, 2016 at 5:39 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(February 8, 2016 at 12:28 pm)Aegon Wrote: 32 pages later and people still don't understand what constitutes evidence in historiography...
Oh sorry, I was supposed to be done with this thread. I'll see my way back out.
*shrug* I'm an historian by education and training (if not by profession).
I'm concerned with the evidence present in history, not historiography.
Boru
The two go hand in hand, no?
Also, what did you study / what are your areas of interest? (don't mean that in a challenging way, I'm genuinely curious)