(February 12, 2016 at 4:22 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:(February 12, 2016 at 4:03 pm)Aroura Wrote:I enjoy movie adaptations, like all the HP films (well, except 3, lol)
You mean except 3 of them, or except the third?
I thought the third was meh too, until I watched this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hZ_ZyzCO24
Oh yeah, let me be clear, the film STYLE is lovely. I like the dark and edgier look, the movement and more artistic film styling. It is the actual CONTENT that drives me up a wall. The fact that Harry acts very out of character compared to the rest of the films (and books), including the later, even darker films. There is a lot of stuff in that movie (including Michael Gambon's first film as Dumbledore and he just wrecked it badly, but grew into the role in later films), that does not feel like I know those people. That is not Harry. That is not Dumbledore. Black is great, Lupin is ok (though again, written better in later films), Ron is even whinier than normal, Hermoinie is just a walking cliche. So I suppose it is really the treatment of the central characters and locations that I dislike. As a stand alone film, if it was not a HP story based of a book that takes place in the middle of an ongoing plot...yeah, it's a lovely looking film for sure! If only the director had cared as much about the characters as he did about the art of the film itself.
I know a lot of film critics love the third film for it's style, and I have no issues with that. Again, I just disagree with the content.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead