Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Statler Waldorf]

---

Oh Come on TDOA, I thought you were above this kind of childish stuff, was I wrong? I have just been super busy, and have not even had a chance to read any of the longer replies.

Oh, I only posted that in light-hearted jest by poking a little fun at you.
I apoligize if you didn't think it was funny, as my brand of humor can be hit or miss, but I didn't mean anything by it.

By all means, take your time. I'm not rushing you. I'm probably looking at a long absence myself before too long as I may be moving out of state sometime within this or next month. Also - dealing with taxes and other projects I've held off a little too long and hopefully a new job.

---

No worries mate. I don't mind a little light hearted fun, even at my own expense. What state do you live in and what one are you moving to? I've only been able to get on here about 15 mins at a time, so it will be a bit before I can produce a reply of any length.

---

Hello Waldorf, you were gone so long I was beginning to think you'd been raptured or something.

Been able to reconcile ASC with the neccesity for c to be a constant in order for E=mc2 to work?

And since E=mc2 seems to work so well...........

---

Hey Zen,

Well I don't believe in a secret rapture, so... :-)

To be honest I am getting a bit bored with the whole ASC discussion (Astronomy does not interest me nearly as much as Biology, Logic, Apologetics, Movies, Guitar, Girls, Heavy Metal Music, Politics and Theology), but I will answer your question anyways. Well in E=mc^2, "c" is the average speed of light in a vacuum, since we can only measure this in a round trip we do not need to invoke a synchrony convention, so the value for "c" is the same regardless of which synchrony convention is used. Does that make sense?