RE: Christian couple told they can't adopt due to their views on homosexuality.
March 1, 2011 at 3:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 1, 2011 at 3:19 pm by Jaysyn.)
(March 1, 2011 at 12:48 pm)Tiberius Wrote: The government isn't in the business of creating and upholding morals. The government should create and uphold laws, and one of those laws is the protection of religious beliefs. The government should no more deny a homophobic religious person the chance of adopting a child as it should an anti-religious homosexual. People's beliefs should be protected under the law, end of.
What Adrian may have well Wrote:The government isn't in the business of creating and upholding morals. The government should create and uphold laws, and one of those laws is the protection of religious beliefs. The government should no more deny a racist religious person the chance of adopting a child as it should an non-racist atheist person.Emphasis mine. And don't try to say I'm comparing apples & oranges. Homosexuals are a protected class in the USA, so that argument won't fly.
BTW, the welfare of the child trumps the potential foster parents / adopter's rights, every time, in every situation, without question. You don't like it? Well, I guess that just sucks for you.
(March 1, 2011 at 12:48 pm)Tiberius Wrote: People's beliefs should be protected under the law, end of.That's cute. They can still believe whatever they'd like to believe. Doesn't mean they get to adopt. Adoption is a privilege, not a right.
Let me ask you a question? If a Christian Scientist couple was denied adoption because they stated that they wouldn't provide the child with medical care other than prayer, would you still be saying that they should be allowed to adopt? I didn't think so.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal