(February 16, 2016 at 4:45 am)Alex K Wrote: Why should the public be allowed to see her emails? That's absurdDon't know, but there's no use in debating it when they've already been released.
However, I think it's special circumstances though:
Quote:A controversy arose in March 2015, when it became publicly known that Hillary Clinton exclusively used her family's private email server for her official email communications while , rather than utilizing official State Department email accounts maintained on federal government servers.
If anyone else's emails were released, yes I do think it's absurd. However I think the reasoning behind it is that once the public found out her emails weren't totally secure, everyone wanted to know if it was a huge deal or not, if it mattered. Once the gov. started looking into it, curiosity arose, everyone became worried.
I don't know why they are released, I honestly don't. Not that I don't think they should be released, I just don't understand why they would be released publicly, since the gov. could just lie and avoid controversy(or at least control it).
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
