RE: A Challenge to You All: Prove I'm not God
February 18, 2016 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2016 at 7:12 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
Proof That FebruaryOfReason Is Not God
1. Gods are not, by their very nature, amenable to 'proof', as commonly understood.
1a. Concordant with #1, gods rely on the faith of believers to maintain existence.
2. Since proof is the antithesis of faith, a god would not ask to be 'proved' to exist.
3. Thus, no being who demands that others prove It exists could be considered a god.
4. FebruaryOfReason had demanded proof of his divinity.
C. FebruaryOfReason is not God.
check of proof: Human beings have a reasonable case to expect less twatish behaviour from gods. QED.
Boru
1. Gods are not, by their very nature, amenable to 'proof', as commonly understood.
1a. Concordant with #1, gods rely on the faith of believers to maintain existence.
2. Since proof is the antithesis of faith, a god would not ask to be 'proved' to exist.
3. Thus, no being who demands that others prove It exists could be considered a god.
4. FebruaryOfReason had demanded proof of his divinity.
C. FebruaryOfReason is not God.
check of proof: Human beings have a reasonable case to expect less twatish behaviour from gods. QED.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax