RE: William Lane Craig's last math class was in high school?!
February 21, 2016 at 4:36 pm
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2016 at 4:37 pm by Alex K.)
(February 21, 2016 at 4:27 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(February 21, 2016 at 1:11 pm)Alex K Wrote: Ok. Why is this interesting?
He writes on Big Bang cosmology and critiques world-class cosmologists, and yet, by all appearances, the man has never completed Calculus I. WLC is a pathetic joke, likely, a lying charlatan who is laughing his way to the bank.
In order to critique big bang cosmology on a technical level without relying heavily on outside sources, you need more than some maths in college. You need to be a full blown researcher active in the field, so whether he completed calculus or not doesn't make much of a difference from that perspective.
He does try to use advanced cosmological arguments e.g. by citing the Borde,Guth,Vilenkin theorem on initial singularities. When asked, they themselves said that the theorem doesn't say what WLC would like it to say. He still continued making the same argument apparently. The guy has zero intellectual integrity and no respect for knowledge, he could have two phds in cosmology and still be a fraud.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
