I got one more question.
How does objective morality handle situations that aren't clear cut, where a compromise must be made between two outcomes? It's easy as pie if it's just "cut off someone's head" versus "not cut off someone's head". But what happens when both options have undesirable but very different consequences? How is this reconciled without resorting to anyone's particular evaluation of those outcomes?
I tried this before, asking for examples. Only one person ever gave me any, and their way of resolving it was to always make sure their accountability to God was OK. Everything and everyone else came second. Shocking and scary.
How does objective morality handle situations that aren't clear cut, where a compromise must be made between two outcomes? It's easy as pie if it's just "cut off someone's head" versus "not cut off someone's head". But what happens when both options have undesirable but very different consequences? How is this reconciled without resorting to anyone's particular evaluation of those outcomes?
I tried this before, asking for examples. Only one person ever gave me any, and their way of resolving it was to always make sure their accountability to God was OK. Everything and everyone else came second. Shocking and scary.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum