RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 28, 2016 at 11:16 am
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2016 at 11:17 am by Angrboda.)
(February 28, 2016 at 10:34 am)Little Rik Wrote:(February 27, 2016 at 11:40 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Biological evolution applies to species, not individuals. If you had half a clue what you are talking about, you would know this. That you think 'life' teaches you other things is laughable. On top of everything else, you're using multiple definitions of the word evolution as if they were all the same thing. That's a fallacy. You don't 'evolve' biologically speaking. Your claiming that you do is just a word game.
Wrong again yog.![]()
As usual you jump to conclusion without taking in consideration all points.![]()
1) You don't take in consideration that low form of lives are mainly driven by mother nature.
In science this occurrence is better known as instinct.
I say mainly because in some plants like climbers and in some animals also the free will start to wake up.
Nothing however as the free will in humans.
Humans on the other hand have mainly free will and instinct play a smaller part.
That means that man (both sex of course) can evolve thanks to his own effort and at the same time can loose his consciousness (devolution) according to his own free will.
Lower form of life however tend to go along together as instinct drive them or better say force them
to follow a certain path so there are not big evolutionary differences until they merge into human life.
This has nothing to do with the point I made about your equivocation of the term evolution and your mistaking biological evolution as being something that happens to individuals. You can claim that I am wrong all the doo dah day and at the end of it all, you are still the one who is making a mistake.
(February 28, 2016 at 10:34 am)Little Rik Wrote: 2) Darwin never took in consideration that any form of life always end up there where it fit best
just like a pieces that fit in a jigsaw puzzle game.
Nothing to do with survival.
Consciousness and energy are the two sides of the same coin.
Nothing ever die.
Nothing is ever destroyed.
Life continue.
If that piece can not fit in a particular jigsaw then it will end up in a different one where it can fit
perfectly.
The idea that survival is the thing that trigger evolution is 100% crap.
Form of lives always survive.
You just can not get rid of energy and consciousness.
It is impossible.
It never happen and will never happen.![]()
Here i stop because if i tell you how all started and how all end up your brain could not take it at this stage in time.
This is just more babbling aimed at a strawman of evolution. Again you are confusing the scientific theory of biological evolution with other types of evolution which don't necessarily apply to the species level. In short, you are using the words in an incorrect manner, and knowing or not knowing your 'system' has no effect on my ability to judge that. The theory of biological evolution doesn't say that "survival is the thing that trigger evolution" so your saying that it does say that is pure crap. Nobody gives a rat's ass about your theory of the evolution of consciousness. That's a red herring you brought in because you don't understand how it differs from biological evolution. In short, you've just made a mess filled with strawmen and other fallacies.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)