I believe that's not only presumptuous of you as a broad and untrue generalization where particularly it applies to me, but it's a bad case of special pleading and an appeal to emotion. Just because someone has gone through those internal arguments and discussions and came to a different conclusion doesn't automatically make your conclusion correct or mean that they haven't done through the same process. I feel that your position is in denial of indicative proof, prefering a materialistic approach which , IMO, falls woefully short of reality for me.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari