(March 4, 2016 at 5:03 am)Harris Wrote:(March 3, 2016 at 6:59 am)paulpablo Wrote: Harris you're pretty good at replying to comments and you have had a lot to reply to but I just want to remind you that you forgot to reply to my comment this time. I was talking about the laws of science.
Thank you for appreciating my responses. I always endeavour to put things in their original form without contaminating them with fancy ideas that are subject to personal desires. God is the only logical answer to all puzzling questions that people have created intentionally for the purpose to resist the idea of God.
This time I have not responded you because Chad has given a fairly decent response which in my opinion does not require further elaborations.
“You're right descriptions are after-the-fact accounts. When someone asks, why did x, y, and z happen, they are not asking for an after-the-fact description of x, y, and z. They want to know what thing made x, y, and z happen, regardless of how that thing is described.”
So how does that relate to scientific laws?
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
