(March 4, 2016 at 4:59 am)Harris Wrote:(March 2, 2016 at 5:49 pm)little_monkey Wrote: Yes, that was the point of the syllogism.
You would need to prove that.
I had depicted a general view on how logic works. It always starts from intelligible objects however it may end in other observable object or in some metaphysical concept. It all depends upon what you are trying to explore by the use of logic.
IOW, you have no evidence. With your point of view, anyone can start with logic and then develop any metaphysical concept. But how would you decide which metaphysical concept is true, since you have no evidence to differentiate those that are true from those that false?