RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
March 5, 2016 at 4:53 am
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2016 at 4:53 am by little_monkey.)
(March 4, 2016 at 11:03 am)Little Rik Wrote:(March 3, 2016 at 11:02 am)little_monkey Wrote: How does that answer my post? Whether you look inside or outside, whatever that suppose to mean, the requirement is the same: if you make any assertion without evidence then it can be dismissed without evidence. So far, you have made many claims, but have furnished no evidence for your claims. If you accept this principle of making assertions without evidence then any crackpot theory is valid. How will you distinguish a crackpot theory from yours? You can't. Therefore your theory is as valid as any other crackpot theory.
Son.
Or you are new in this forum or you do not read the posts with due attention.
If you would have read properly you would have noticed that for every of my post that come without solid evidence atheists post 10 times posts devoid of evidence.
But how does that make your principle of "making assertion without evidence" valid??? So you're saying, "some people are doing it (atheists in your post), therefore I can do it".Well, that's a poor excuse. Two wrongs don't make it right.