(March 7, 2011 at 10:26 am)Watson Wrote: RJ, your insistence on 'proof' of a soul is your obvious downfall to any one with half a brain. First because you haven't outlined what it is you'd like as proof, or what consititues as, and second because any proof tack gave you would fail to satisfy your unreasonable criteria for what counts as proof. The soul is a personal thing, we find it within ourselves and all the proof one needs of it is a glance at the inner workings of oneself. It's like breathing, something you do all the time but could almost never explain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathing
There you go, now you know what breathing is.
Now what EXACTLY is a soul.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.