My views on objective morality

[robvalue]

So CL, you're saying the bodily autonomy of the rapist is very important, but the autonomy of the child being raped isn't important?

If one or other has to be violated, which should it be?

Also, god invented rape. He could have had a universe where rape was simply impossible, and no one would even think about it. Instead we could have been given the freedom to explore the ~100% of the universe which is deadly to us. Instead we're glued to a rock while god watches rapists and does nothing.

Why is the possibility to "do evil" so important? Why must an innocent child pay the price for this? This is god inventing and allowing evil acts, he is not just complicit but the instigator. Like I've said above, there are a million and one things we could be allowed to do instead of raping children, yet we can't. Why is this option so important? I don't do evil things, yet I have free will just fine. I'm just blocked from doing almost all the things I would like to do which wouldn't hurt anyone.