Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 27, 2024, 10:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Natural Order and Science
RE: Natural Order and Science
Quote mining again, but this time taking more time to mangle the sentences so that they are harder to google.


(March 8, 2016 at 5:02 am)Harris Wrote: Infra-red divergences are due to using UNPHYSICAL variables to describe in and out states and introduce gauge invariant, physical “dressed” states. In scattering calculations, it is a common tendency to make an assumption that the coupling constant can be set to zero at infinitely remote times. In QED this might appear reasonable while in QCD such calculations are often based on the premise of some parton-hadron duality. The results of scattering calculations are, though, plagued by infra-red (IR) divergences.

http://pos.sissa.it/archive/conferences/...09_023.pdf

(March 8, 2016 at 5:02 am)Harris Wrote: It has long been known that the soft divergences occurring in QED can be cancelled out in transition rates or cross sections computed for detectors with finite energy resolution: the soft divergences which occur in a scattering process due to the emission of an undetected soft real photons with total energy ≤ El exactly cancel out the soft divergences due to virtual photon corrections order by order in perturbation theory. This cancellation was first shown by Bloch and Nordsieck in QED and is referred to as Bloch-Nordsieck theorem. In ordinary (commutative) Yang-Mills theories just as in QED, there exist IR (soft) divergences due to MASSLESS GLUONS. This has been guaranteed by the theorems of Kinoshita and of Lee and Nauenberg known as KLN theorem which states that the transition rates are free of the collinear and soft divergences if we sum over initial and final states. This theorem is a fundamental quantum mechanical theorem on the basis of unitarity of S-matrix.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0609181.pdf
http://pos.sissa.it/archive/conferences/...09_023.pdf


(March 8, 2016 at 5:02 am)Harris Wrote: Field theories with space-time non-commutativity, for example, do not have a unitary S-matrix. The extra branch cuts in these theories, are developed in the loop diagrams which are responsible for the failure of the cutting rules and lack of unitary S-matrix.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0005129.pdf

(March 8, 2016 at 5:02 am)Harris Wrote: In a scattering process computed up to one-loop order, if we consider the non-commutative soft photon emission, the non-commutative logarithmic IR divergence in the vertex correction will be cancelled in the cross section. However, there are additional non-Abelian type diagrams in which their non-commutative logarithmic and quadratic divergences cannot be cancelled out using the cross section method. This non-cancellation is attributed to an important difference between soft and non-commutative IR divergences. The soft divergences are associated with the classical limit but non-commutative IR divergences are completely a quantum mechanical effect and the soft divergences that only appear in the non-planar vertex correction to be cancelled out in the physical cross section to all orders.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0609181.pdf
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 16, 2016 at 1:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 16, 2016 at 1:38 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by abaris - February 16, 2016 at 6:55 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Fidel_Castronaut - February 16, 2016 at 3:45 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 16, 2016 at 5:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:34 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 16, 2016 at 6:39 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 16, 2016 at 7:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by StuW - February 16, 2016 at 7:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:37 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 16, 2016 at 7:45 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 16, 2016 at 7:46 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Mr.wizard - February 16, 2016 at 7:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:37 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 20, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:51 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 16, 2016 at 7:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 16, 2016 at 8:12 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:39 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 16, 2016 at 9:14 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:40 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 16, 2016 at 9:29 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:43 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 18, 2016 at 5:00 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 5:07 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 18, 2016 at 7:17 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 20, 2016 at 2:29 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 20, 2016 at 11:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:55 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 5:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 22, 2016 at 2:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Jackalope - February 18, 2016 at 7:35 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 18, 2016 at 9:50 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Whateverist - February 20, 2016 at 2:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 16, 2016 at 12:29 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Ben Davis - February 16, 2016 at 1:34 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 16, 2016 at 1:54 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 16, 2016 at 6:39 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - February 16, 2016 at 6:47 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 16, 2016 at 7:26 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - February 16, 2016 at 9:59 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 16, 2016 at 11:33 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Valkyrie - February 16, 2016 at 10:03 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by emjay - February 16, 2016 at 11:59 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 17, 2016 at 9:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by emjay - February 17, 2016 at 10:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 17, 2016 at 8:22 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - February 17, 2016 at 12:27 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 17, 2016 at 12:47 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 17, 2016 at 5:20 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 17, 2016 at 6:32 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 17, 2016 at 7:27 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 17, 2016 at 10:56 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 18, 2016 at 9:38 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 18, 2016 at 9:44 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 18, 2016 at 10:21 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 18, 2016 at 10:42 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Excited Penguin - February 18, 2016 at 10:50 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:46 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by emjay - February 17, 2016 at 8:49 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 17, 2016 at 9:09 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by emjay - February 17, 2016 at 9:27 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 17, 2016 at 9:37 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by emjay - February 17, 2016 at 9:57 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - February 18, 2016 at 12:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 18, 2016 at 4:45 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - February 18, 2016 at 6:03 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 18, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 18, 2016 at 12:21 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 18, 2016 at 9:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 18, 2016 at 12:07 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by abaris - February 18, 2016 at 7:59 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - February 18, 2016 at 9:31 pm
Natural Order and Science - by LadyForCamus - February 18, 2016 at 9:37 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 20, 2016 at 2:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 20, 2016 at 2:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 20, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Ivan Denisovich - February 20, 2016 at 3:39 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 20, 2016 at 4:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Ivan Denisovich - February 20, 2016 at 7:47 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:50 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Ivan Denisovich - February 22, 2016 at 3:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Ivan Denisovich - February 23, 2016 at 3:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 20, 2016 at 10:31 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:53 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 22, 2016 at 12:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 23, 2016 at 12:11 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 2:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 20, 2016 at 10:26 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 5:17 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 20, 2016 at 11:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 20, 2016 at 5:08 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:58 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 5:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 23, 2016 at 4:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 1:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 26, 2016 at 5:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 20, 2016 at 11:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:56 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 22, 2016 at 12:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 23, 2016 at 3:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 23, 2016 at 3:24 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 1:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 26, 2016 at 3:37 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 29, 2016 at 2:12 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - February 29, 2016 at 2:35 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by downbeatplumb - February 29, 2016 at 2:41 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 29, 2016 at 4:50 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 1, 2016 at 1:25 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - March 1, 2016 at 4:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:12 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 2, 2016 at 4:54 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 3, 2016 at 4:33 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 3, 2016 at 8:34 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 4, 2016 at 5:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 4, 2016 at 7:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 4, 2016 at 12:18 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 7, 2016 at 2:48 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 5:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 20, 2016 at 3:22 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Whateverist - February 20, 2016 at 4:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 20, 2016 at 5:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 21, 2016 at 11:48 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 5:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - February 20, 2016 at 9:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 20, 2016 at 11:10 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 21, 2016 at 11:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 22, 2016 at 5:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 22, 2016 at 6:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 22, 2016 at 6:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 22, 2016 at 8:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 23, 2016 at 3:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - February 23, 2016 at 3:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 23, 2016 at 4:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 1:57 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 23, 2016 at 4:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - February 23, 2016 at 9:20 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 23, 2016 at 12:22 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 1:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 24, 2016 at 4:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 24, 2016 at 5:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 24, 2016 at 4:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - February 24, 2016 at 6:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 24, 2016 at 8:16 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 24, 2016 at 6:20 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 24, 2016 at 7:50 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 24, 2016 at 8:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 24, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 24, 2016 at 9:20 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 24, 2016 at 9:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 26, 2016 at 2:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 24, 2016 at 9:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 26, 2016 at 3:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 26, 2016 at 4:24 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 29, 2016 at 2:13 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 29, 2016 at 4:21 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:09 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 2, 2016 at 12:44 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 2, 2016 at 3:48 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 4:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 4, 2016 at 5:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 4, 2016 at 5:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 6, 2016 at 9:06 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - March 6, 2016 at 9:16 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 6, 2016 at 9:20 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - March 6, 2016 at 9:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - March 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 2:30 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 5:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:24 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:29 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 8, 2016 at 5:45 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 7, 2016 at 7:01 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 8:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 5:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 8, 2016 at 5:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 12:11 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 1:53 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 8, 2016 at 2:03 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 3:06 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - February 29, 2016 at 9:06 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:11 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - March 3, 2016 at 7:34 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 26, 2016 at 5:25 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - February 26, 2016 at 5:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 29, 2016 at 2:15 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - February 29, 2016 at 4:49 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:10 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 2, 2016 at 5:49 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 4:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 5, 2016 at 4:48 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 5:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 10:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 10, 2016 at 6:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 10, 2016 at 3:23 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 13, 2016 at 5:23 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 13, 2016 at 5:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 15, 2016 at 5:06 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 15, 2016 at 5:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 13, 2016 at 9:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 13, 2016 at 12:44 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 15, 2016 at 5:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 15, 2016 at 6:20 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 15, 2016 at 10:23 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 16, 2016 at 9:52 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 16, 2016 at 4:46 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 17, 2016 at 3:21 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 17, 2016 at 8:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 18, 2016 at 7:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - March 18, 2016 at 7:39 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 18, 2016 at 7:47 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 18, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 18, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 18, 2016 at 7:42 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 18, 2016 at 10:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 19, 2016 at 4:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 19, 2016 at 10:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 20, 2016 at 9:16 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 20, 2016 at 12:18 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 21, 2016 at 2:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 21, 2016 at 3:06 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 21, 2016 at 11:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 21, 2016 at 11:36 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2016 at 3:25 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 22, 2016 at 7:42 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2016 at 7:46 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 22, 2016 at 10:17 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 22, 2016 at 11:49 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2016 at 6:21 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 24, 2016 at 7:42 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 24, 2016 at 8:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 24, 2016 at 9:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 24, 2016 at 10:19 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 22, 2016 at 7:38 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 22, 2016 at 11:48 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 23, 2016 at 4:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 24, 2016 at 7:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 24, 2016 at 8:52 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 24, 2016 at 9:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 24, 2016 at 3:30 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2016 at 7:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 16, 2016 at 10:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 17, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 17, 2016 at 10:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 18, 2016 at 7:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 18, 2016 at 12:29 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 19, 2016 at 4:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 19, 2016 at 11:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 8, 2016 at 11:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 10, 2016 at 7:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 10, 2016 at 7:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 10, 2016 at 7:57 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 10, 2016 at 8:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 10, 2016 at 10:27 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 10, 2016 at 9:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 10, 2016 at 7:19 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 10, 2016 at 7:34 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 10, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 1, 2016 at 5:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - February 26, 2016 at 5:39 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 26, 2016 at 6:31 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - February 29, 2016 at 2:16 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - February 29, 2016 at 4:56 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:11 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 1, 2016 at 4:38 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by downbeatplumb - March 2, 2016 at 1:32 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 1, 2016 at 8:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:13 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 3, 2016 at 8:29 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 1, 2016 at 8:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:14 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 2, 2016 at 12:41 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 2, 2016 at 12:50 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 2, 2016 at 1:26 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 4:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 3, 2016 at 3:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Jackalope - March 3, 2016 at 4:17 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 5:01 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 4, 2016 at 5:16 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Heat - March 3, 2016 at 3:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 3, 2016 at 4:41 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - March 3, 2016 at 5:26 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 3, 2016 at 5:27 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 3, 2016 at 5:44 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 4, 2016 at 5:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - March 3, 2016 at 6:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - March 3, 2016 at 8:06 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 5:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - March 4, 2016 at 9:12 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by paulpablo - March 4, 2016 at 10:04 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 4, 2016 at 5:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 4, 2016 at 5:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 4, 2016 at 5:22 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 4, 2016 at 5:24 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 5, 2016 at 5:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by bennyboy - March 5, 2016 at 7:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 5, 2016 at 7:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 5, 2016 at 8:42 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 5, 2016 at 9:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - March 5, 2016 at 9:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 5, 2016 at 11:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by IATIA - March 5, 2016 at 12:17 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 5, 2016 at 11:01 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 5, 2016 at 3:21 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 5, 2016 at 5:30 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 5, 2016 at 5:39 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 4:44 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 6, 2016 at 5:33 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 6:26 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 6, 2016 at 4:14 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 6, 2016 at 5:25 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 6, 2016 at 6:01 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 6:27 am
Natural Order and Science - by LadyForCamus - March 6, 2016 at 9:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 10:00 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 10:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 10:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 10:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 10:23 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 10:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 12:03 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 3:39 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 6, 2016 at 4:25 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 5:15 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 6, 2016 at 5:18 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 3:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 7, 2016 at 7:22 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 7, 2016 at 5:19 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 6, 2016 at 10:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 6, 2016 at 10:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 7, 2016 at 3:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Fidel_Castronaut - March 7, 2016 at 1:27 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 3:05 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 7, 2016 at 8:57 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 5:55 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 7, 2016 at 6:28 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 7, 2016 at 7:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 7, 2016 at 8:24 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 11:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 3:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 8, 2016 at 4:43 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 5:03 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:37 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 8, 2016 at 6:31 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 4:50 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 8, 2016 at 5:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:10 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 5:31 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:36 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 8, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 7:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 10, 2016 at 6:57 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 10, 2016 at 7:09 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 8, 2016 at 5:11 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 8, 2016 at 5:27 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:53 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 8, 2016 at 6:05 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 8, 2016 at 5:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Neo-Scholastic - March 8, 2016 at 1:40 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 8, 2016 at 2:29 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 9, 2016 at 3:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 9, 2016 at 9:56 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 9, 2016 at 10:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 9, 2016 at 10:13 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 9, 2016 at 10:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 9, 2016 at 11:19 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 9, 2016 at 4:09 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 10, 2016 at 7:14 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 11, 2016 at 4:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 13, 2016 at 5:27 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 13, 2016 at 10:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 15, 2016 at 5:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 15, 2016 at 5:47 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:48 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 16, 2016 at 9:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 16, 2016 at 9:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 16, 2016 at 10:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 17, 2016 at 3:16 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 17, 2016 at 4:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 18, 2016 at 7:31 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 16, 2016 at 10:30 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by FebruaryOfReason - March 13, 2016 at 6:12 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 15, 2016 at 5:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 15, 2016 at 5:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 16, 2016 at 9:50 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 16, 2016 at 10:21 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 13, 2016 at 7:04 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 15, 2016 at 5:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 15, 2016 at 6:07 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 13, 2016 at 11:03 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by FebruaryOfReason - March 13, 2016 at 11:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 13, 2016 at 12:36 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Rhondazvous - March 13, 2016 at 1:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 13, 2016 at 2:25 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Rhondazvous - March 20, 2016 at 4:43 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by little_monkey - March 20, 2016 at 4:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Little lunch - March 13, 2016 at 5:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:12 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:22 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:25 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:29 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:32 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:40 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:46 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:50 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 5:52 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 5:54 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 15, 2016 at 6:15 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 15, 2016 at 6:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 16, 2016 at 9:59 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 16, 2016 at 10:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 16, 2016 at 10:10 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 16, 2016 at 10:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Whateverist - March 16, 2016 at 11:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Angrboda - March 16, 2016 at 11:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 17, 2016 at 3:19 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 16, 2016 at 11:18 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Harris - March 17, 2016 at 3:23 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by ignoramus - March 17, 2016 at 4:55 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 17, 2016 at 12:52 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Cyberman - March 18, 2016 at 11:26 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 20, 2016 at 1:43 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Esquilax - March 20, 2016 at 1:56 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by Alex K - March 20, 2016 at 4:57 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 21, 2016 at 2:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 21, 2016 at 3:08 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 22, 2016 at 7:49 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 22, 2016 at 7:51 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2016 at 7:58 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 22, 2016 at 8:02 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 23, 2016 at 5:35 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by I_am_not_mafia - March 24, 2016 at 10:28 am
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 24, 2016 at 1:26 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by robvalue - March 24, 2016 at 3:07 pm
RE: Natural Order and Science - by The Grand Nudger - March 24, 2016 at 3:57 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Relationship between programming languages and natural languages FlatAssembler 13 1312 June 12, 2023 at 9:39 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Does a natural "god" maybe exist? Skeptic201 19 1796 November 27, 2022 at 7:46 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The difference between computing and science. highdimensionman 0 382 February 25, 2022 at 11:54 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 7864 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Do Humans have a Natural State? Shining_Finger 13 2604 April 1, 2016 at 4:42 am
Last Post: robvalue
  The relationship between Science and Philosophy Dolorian 14 5291 October 3, 2014 at 11:27 pm
Last Post: HopOnPop
  Natural Laws, and Causation. TheBigOhMan 3 1629 June 4, 2013 at 11:45 pm
Last Post: TheBigOhMan
  Shit man, im a natural born killer! Disciple 37 16297 April 28, 2012 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: Cinjin



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)