(March 8, 2016 at 10:53 am)little_monkey Wrote: Your post illustrates perfectly what I was implying: since you have no way to differentiate between what is true or false, then your proposal "our beings encompass a huge amount of data stored in our conscience, a gift of nature, blah,blah...' is just another statement that has no validity. The question you should be asking: how can one differentiate a crackpot theory from the real thing? If you have no test to differentiate these two, then your theory is no more and no less valid than any other crackpot theory. So you can advance the idea that "our beings encompass a huge amount of data stored in our conscience, a gift of nature, blah, blah..."but it is no different than any other crackpot theory.
Are you saying that you can differentiate all truths of nature because you have handful knowledge about the physical world?
Has your scientific knowledge brought you any jackpot theory about your own life?
Are you saying you have followed strictly laws of physics in making all your emotional decisions in your life?
If you are saying all that then I do not believe you.
