RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
March 11, 2016 at 9:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 11, 2016 at 9:35 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 11, 2016 at 12:08 pm)Little Rik Wrote:(March 11, 2016 at 11:39 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Giving up so soon? Wise choice.
Now about your evidence that the pineal gland has anything to do with consciousness. What is it? Wouldn't want to depend on mere dogma, would we?
First is the supreme consciousness then the mind the space the air the light-energy the water and the matter.
From here is easy to understand that the consciousness is the very top and the matter the very bottom
and the human body is none but a mirror of that reality.
More unevidenced assertions. I tire of your dogma, give me reasons.
(March 11, 2016 at 12:08 pm)Little Rik Wrote: Along the spinal cord there are all these element that control the solid the liquid the heat the air the space
the mind and the consciousness in the exact way as the importance require.
More assertions. Are you ever going to get to the evidence?
(March 11, 2016 at 12:08 pm)Little Rik Wrote: So yes the pineal gland is located at the very top of the spinal cord because is from here that control all the rest.
As the supreme consciousness create the universe with these 7 elements is obvious that the consciousness is the most important and as the pineal gland is located at the very top is obvious that
control all the rest but is the expansion of consciousness that tell this as well.
The fact that something is at the top of the spinal cord doesn't demonstrate that it is in control. The pituatary gland is equally at the top, I don't see you arguing its case. By "is obvious that" is usually code for, "I don't fucking know but I'm going to claim it anyway," so I'll assume that you're using it in that sense. And expansion of consciousness is a non-starter as well; you just want to drag this out of the arena of evidence so you can assert your yogic dogma. What about the pineal gland makes you think it is in control of anything, besides this weak sauce it's the top argument? You do realize the spinal cord has both efferent and afferent neurons -- perhaps the pineal gland is the thing being controlled! The rest of the brain is also at the top of the spinal cord and makes eminently more sense as a locus of control as we have shown that damage to parts of it affect that self-same control.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)