RE: Mind is the brain?
March 13, 2016 at 3:32 pm
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2016 at 3:38 pm by bennyboy.)
(March 13, 2016 at 12:43 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 10:07 pm)bennyboy Wrote: *Someone called my name?*You've been saying this for as long as we've been discussing it. It's no more true now than it was the first time you said it. You aren't satisfied with a material monist explanation, with the manner that material monist's discuss qualia.
The problem for a material monism is this: it completely disregards, and has no capacity for discussing or explaining, qualia.
Not being satisfied is not interchangeable with "no capacity for discussing or explaining".
Ru-heally? You sure?
Okay, tell me, by what criteria will I establish whether a given system experiences qualia?
*Absuive redefinition of "qualia" into physical monist terms in 5. . . 4. . . 3. . . 2. . . 1 . . *