Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

1) You say ........The brain is a physical organ in the body.  The mind and consciousness are products of the brain's operation.

Wrong.  
There is no evidence of whatsoever that this is the case.

And I've told you before, after providing said evidence, that you're just a liar on this point.

You provided what?
Show me, show me girl.

Energy and consciousness are dependent on each other to function however it is the consciousness that
start the action as it awake from the latent stage.

No evidence that this is the case.

A dead body is still full of energy but it can't do anything by itself.
On the other hand it can do a lot once the consciousness is there.
You never thought about it yog, did you?  

This can be seen in some types of matter that release energy like uranium.
The matter had energy in it long long before it was able to release it.
Why then didn't release before?

First off, you're mischaracterizing the radioactive decay of uranium.  It decays in a steady mode.  It doesn't wait a "long long" time.  See the Toklo reactor for evidence that radioactive substances decay at a regular rate.

There is something that you haven't considered.
One thing is to allow the normal life of something.
The other is to interfere in their lives.
It is obvious that if you interfere the result will be different.
Once you bring the radioactive substances into a reactor you interfere
and therefore you can not expect to see the same result as if the substances will be left alone
to follow the natural course.
You never thought about it yog, did you?  

The simple reason is that it had to wait for the consciousness within to get out her state of
slumber so to speak.
Brain is full of energy but energy can not start the action by herself.
Consciousness is always needed that is why to say that the consciousness is a product of the brain is
pure madness.

Since your understanding of the evidence is wrong, your conclusion is also likely wrong.

In this case show me why i am wrong.  

2) Question......what trigger the start of evolution?

You reply....Energy.


Wrong again.
Energy is everywhere in matter but only some types of matter release energy.
But let me explain what the word DECAY means in this particular context.
Decay in matter means that that particular matter is in the process of deterioration
it can not keep as it is or better say as it was for ever.
It need to make a change.
Nothing is destroyed in nature.
It just change.
But the energy in order to make the change need some sort of awareness.
This awareness is called consciousness.
Energy and consciousness always go hand in hand.
And the consciousness in order to trigger the change need to get out the lumber stage in which she was.
Even science tell us that the decay of elements has to do with releasing energy over time.
Unfortunately science is still not aware that energy and consciousness are the two sides of the same coin.
So the trigger is the awakening of consciousness not the energy.

You say that energy and consciousness are two sides of the same coin, yet when I assert energy, you claim that "instead" it was consciousness.  If they're two sides of a coin, it's the same thing!  You can't even make up your mind.

Look at yourself girl.
You got a body and a mind-consciousness.
Who you think is in charge.
Does your body tell your mind what to do or the other way around?
You never thought about it yog, did you?  

3) Question .........Where evolution take you to?

You answer.....Again, evolution applies to species, not individuals, so it takes 'me' no where.

Wrong again yog.  

There is no evidence that that is the case.
Yours is just a guessing inspired by Darwin.
It make more sense that individuals end up in the jigsaw in which they can fit better and therefore
evolution apply to individuals.
If so many similar individuals fit in a particular jigsaw that shouldn't be interpreted as evolution of the species.

This is just nonsensical word salad.  Even so, it's still wrong to think biological evolution applies to individuals.

Sorry yog but the reality tell you that you are totally wrong.  
Just read my previous thread.

4) What is the relationship between energy and consciousness?

You answer.......Energy sustains the metabolism of the cells of the brain.  The cells of the brain cooperatively create consciousness (or its illusion).

Wrong, wrong, wrong.
How the hell can consciousness be a product of the brain when in fact it is the consciousness that
decide to start any mental or physical action?

There is no conflict there.  The consciousness is the mental and physical action.  They are concurrent.

Yog, you are totally lost.  
Consciousness is something ABSTRACT.
How the hell can the cells of the brain create something abstract?  
Get real girl.  

5) you say.......(Note that not one of these answers involved a metaphor or analogy)

Believe me girl.
It would have been a lot better if you would have use some analogies that make some sense rather
than come down with all this nonsense.
Have a good day anyway.  

And it would be better if you weren't just a loon with a bunch of assertions, dogma, and false analogies, but we can't have everything.

Get real yog.
I already destroyed  all atheists dogmas one by one and yet instead of admit it you guys
act with dishonesty pretending that i don't know what i am talking about.
Shame yog, shame.