Natural Order and Science

[Angrboda]

Well well well! Now atheists have started picking arguments of the theists to counter argue a theist. Is not it funny.

The bad news is all what you have written is nothing but CHERRY PICKING. If you do not know what is Cherry Picking then please check post #376.

After having read #376, the real bad news is that you have no notion what cherry picking means, and have chosen this complaint because it superficially implies that I am guilty of a fault. I am not. And my arguments pointing out the flaws in your claim of "no errors" stands unrefuted. Picking points from anti-Islam sites is only a flaw if those sites actually misrepresent the Quran. So far you have a claim they do, and nothing else. There were literally dozens upon dozens of things linked to in my post. You didn't bother to examine any of them. You simply reasserted your dogma about the Quran not having any errors in it. That doesn't feed the bulldog, I'm afraid. Your claim that I was guilty of "cherry picking" as a flaw is an unsupported red herring.

Unless you want to be guilty of a fallacy yourself, you'll have to support your reasoning with more than dogma. Here, start on this:

2. Quran does not have:

a. Historical errors

The Virgin Mary

In many places, the Qur'an mentions Mary as the sister of Moses and Aaron and the daughter of Imran. The Qur'an has confused Jesus' mother with Aaron's sister because both of them carry the same name, though there are several centuries between them. The Qur'an indicates that Mary (Christ's mother) had a brother whose name was Aaron (chapter 19:28) and a father whose name is Imran (chapter 66:12). Their mother was called "the wife of Imran" (chapter 3:35) which eliminates any doubt that it confuses Mary, mother of Jesus, with Mary, sister of Aaron.

Historical Errors of the Qur'an