Natural Order and Science

[little_monkey]

There are countries in which women are joining the men to fight along in any combat situation.

The reason that in sports, we have separate leagues for men and women is to recognize that men have stronger muscles. That in no way makes men superior to women. 




That is totally illogical.  It is this kind of illogical reasoning that leads to such situations that a woman cannot leave her house without being accompanied by a male of the family. It leads to honor killing, where even if a woman was raped - meaning was forced into sex - she will be killed by a member of her own family, it leads to woman's obligation covered their faces in public, otherwise she can be physically beaten. Where women have been allowed to do more than what Islam permits is in countries that were once a colony of the Western world, and have governments that have embraced some Western values, such as Pakistan, Indonesia, and Turkey. The danger is that these countries are moving more and more towards Islamisation, and whatever Western values are still present, they are being eroded. Just look at Turkey. I visited that country before the Islamic party took control. Women were as free as men then because the government was secular, but since the election of Erdogan, things have changed for the worse for women. 




I don't know where you get these figures, but even if they're true, this is happening in countries in which secular governments are in place, with freedom rights protected by the constitution, and so Sharia law doesn't have a chance to be the law of the land - though in some communities, Sharia law is practiced covertly, predominantly in the UK. But in Islamic countries, where the rights of individual is non-existing, the fate of those women are deplorable. 

Look Mr. Professor, you are now provoking me for a cheap dirty fight and that is not the way how professors behave. I can give you hundreds of links that are sufficient to prove horrendous facts about how nasty are the men in modern cultures who beat so ruthlessly their wives, mistresses, and girlfriends that in many cases that brutality ends up in the death of victims.

There is one major difference you have omitted: in the West, those behaviors are outlawed, and those who perpetrate them are brought to justice; in the Islamic states, those behaviors are approved by the law, as those laws follow very closely to Sharia law. So you are comparing apples with oranges.

That ruthlessness is so shocking that no Hollywood made Taliban is capable to compete that.

Hollywood is in the business of making money. The use of violence in those movies is understood that the audience is mature enough to know the difference between reality and fiction. There are exceptions as there are individuals who can't make that distinction, but we are not going to impose laws on movie makers just because a few don't have all of their brain screws properly fixed.

Up so far you have attacked me by using unjust and dishonest arguments of the crooks and in my defence I only showed you the actuality by showing you your mistakes.

I am prone to errors like any human being, but in your case, you cannot admit that you believe in a crackpot theory, and therefore your mind is closed to any criticism.

Think only logically, if Islam is really the religion how you have depicted it then why people are accepting it in Europe and in America.

There are billions of people who believe in one religion or another. But as I have defined those religions, they are all crackpot theories as they do not have an inbuilt mechanism for self correction. So whether one is converting to Islam, or any other religion, they are just moving from one crackpot theory to another.  I just feel sorry for them to live a life of delusion.