RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 20, 2016 at 4:55 pm
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2016 at 5:01 pm by maestroanth.
Edit Reason: OCD
)
(March 20, 2016 at 4:26 pm)PerennialPhilosophy Wrote: Saying we don't learn anything from this is a big statement about epistemology. What do you consider actual learning?
Also, semantics are useful when debating. Often people disagree because they have two different understandings of what a word means. I would recommend reading Phaedrus by Plato for a good look at how important that can be.
Well, by semantics I mean when it doesn't add value to the argument. For example, recently I was debating with a guy whether if perfect pitch is a 'learned ability' or an ability people are simply 'born-with it'. I have perfect pitch and I learned it about 13 years ago as a teenager and my skill actually exceeded many of those that were 'born-with-it'. Anyway, so my argument was simple: Since obviously our notation system is a man-made system, and not made by nature, obviously there is no way to be 'born-with-it'.
My point is that he didn't have a good argument so he attacked the semantics by saying that 'young children don't learn it, they simply have exposure to it early' which pissed me off because really? You say tomato, I say tom-ah-to, it's the same fucking thing we're both referring to. So I didn't reply and tallied it as my victory since no one will ever admit defeat over the internet. Likewise, I feel like a lot religious people go the same rutty route in their arguments.....
And......I already gave examples of what I consider as actual learning. From what I can tell of epistemology in a quick google search, I feel the same about that concept too. Arguing over what constitutes a 'justified belief' vs 'opinion' is just silly and distracting
![Smile Smile](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
(BTW, please don't let this stray off topic about perfect pitch in future replies...thanks!
![Wink Wink](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/wink.gif)
(March 20, 2016 at 4:39 pm)Ivan Denisovich Wrote: I would say that "debates" with believers in general are pointless. You will hear the same old shit again and chance of convincing your oponent are slim at best. Time wasted on such "discussion" could be used on expanding one knowledge.
Ya, that pretty much summarizes how I feel and I always feel guilty when I click on a 'Dawkins vs. some Christian Guy' debate over the calculus tutorial which is 100000 times more interesting but requires focus. - it's like eating ice cream when I should be eating a salad, ;P
![[Image: tumblr_nvrbfbDXgM1u0bifgo1_400.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=41.media.tumblr.com%2F973cc4438173f0121d72f6828c4110cb%2Ftumblr_nvrbfbDXgM1u0bifgo1_400.jpg)