If you mean arguing with people who believe as a matter of faith or dogma is pointless, yes it is. Meaningful debate suggests both parties are rationally evaluating evidence. Creationists regularly admit that they are not. That doesn't leave any room for debate.
The only purpose I see to debating whether creationism is a possible possition is convincing persons actually evaluating the evidence.
The only purpose I see to debating whether creationism is a possible possition is convincing persons actually evaluating the evidence.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
