RE: My views on objective morality
March 27, 2016 at 1:46 am
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2016 at 1:48 am by robvalue.)
It comes down to definitions again. If we define morality so that animals can't possibly be capable of it, then they are not.
Honestly, I don't think it's well-defined. I feel it needs careful definition for any given discussion. Almost all the disagreement I see about it relates to what it actually means in the first place. "Everyone knows what it means" is not useful. I am always suspicious of people who state how obvious something is but won't state what it actually is; they'd rather argue for an hour over how obvious it is than spend 5 seconds just saying what it is.
Honestly, I don't think it's well-defined. I feel it needs careful definition for any given discussion. Almost all the disagreement I see about it relates to what it actually means in the first place. "Everyone knows what it means" is not useful. I am always suspicious of people who state how obvious something is but won't state what it actually is; they'd rather argue for an hour over how obvious it is than spend 5 seconds just saying what it is.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum