RE: The Theistic Paradigm in a Nutshell
March 27, 2016 at 11:00 am
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2016 at 11:05 am by FebruaryOfReason.)
Interesting fact; The phrase "the end justifies the means" was mistranslated from Machiavelli's "The Prince".
The phrase in Machiavelli's original is "si guarda al fine", which translates more literally as "the end result must be considered", i.e. the end result must be weighed against the means needed to achieve it, which is morally a very different thing. Machiavelli was aiming more for something along the lines of "whatever does the greatest good to the most people". (A good example would be Edward Jenner risking the life of one boy by injecting him with smallpox to prove his vaccine worked. Maybe it's not definite that this was worth the risk, but nevertheless, Jenner made a sincere assessment of the likely benefits as set against the possible cost).
But you are right that the theist paradigm does indeed seem to be "The end justifies the means". Many theists do indeed believe that enduring simply anything is worth the pie-in-the-sky prospect of heaven, especially if the suffering in question is being endured by someone else (e.g. your whole family died of plague, so let me lecture you about how God is punishing you for not being virtuous enough. All your friends died of AIDS, so let me lecture you about how it's a punishment for their lewd behaviour). The prospect of heaven will indeed lure them into any logical twist, and any condemnation, however egregious.
The phrase in Machiavelli's original is "si guarda al fine", which translates more literally as "the end result must be considered", i.e. the end result must be weighed against the means needed to achieve it, which is morally a very different thing. Machiavelli was aiming more for something along the lines of "whatever does the greatest good to the most people". (A good example would be Edward Jenner risking the life of one boy by injecting him with smallpox to prove his vaccine worked. Maybe it's not definite that this was worth the risk, but nevertheless, Jenner made a sincere assessment of the likely benefits as set against the possible cost).
But you are right that the theist paradigm does indeed seem to be "The end justifies the means". Many theists do indeed believe that enduring simply anything is worth the pie-in-the-sky prospect of heaven, especially if the suffering in question is being endured by someone else (e.g. your whole family died of plague, so let me lecture you about how God is punishing you for not being virtuous enough. All your friends died of AIDS, so let me lecture you about how it's a punishment for their lewd behaviour). The prospect of heaven will indeed lure them into any logical twist, and any condemnation, however egregious.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.