Proving God in 20 statements

[Nay_Sayer]

I think this proof might work, don't get me wrong. I just want to understand it.  It seems you are making a tautology by 3 double implications, that once you rework, will lead to the conclusion. I just don't know how you concluded on those double implications.

That's right. I use the equivalence rule to break down the double implications into their single implication form.

---

Good one.  I appreciate a theist with a sense of humor.  (Hard to find.)

Maybe you just don't get our jokes.

Sure, You guys have this great one about an invisible sky daddy, Cracks me and FSM up every time.