(April 7, 2016 at 11:32 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:(April 5, 2016 at 2:12 pm)SteveII Wrote: t
You may not agree with him, but he certainly way smarter than average and has thought more on these topics than you ever will.
On your first point, if he were so clever why is his whole schtick to bring out PRATTs and only discuss his strawman refutations of those PRATTs. If he were so clever wouldn't he have come up with his own arguments instead of using long discredited arguments and distorions of and lies about valid research?
On your second point, his teaching consists of preaching in two very minor biblical literalist "colleges" where your ability to toe the party line, viz "the bible is always right. If we find something in nature which contradicts the bible then nature is wrong", counts far more than the relevance of your arguments, your ability to carry out research and, indeed, your intelligence. You cannot use his teaching experience as a testament to his intelligence.
To your first point, what topic are you suggesting that have been "long discredited" and what "distortions of and lies about valid research"?
To your second, I did not bring up his teaching posts. I brought up the fact he has 2 doctorate degrees and written over 30 books.
