Dr. Craig is a liar.

[Jehanne]

Those things which were changed/withdrawn even after passing Peer Review (based on the best knowledge at the time) are because others who looked at the works found better explanations. That's why all knowledge in science, and all the theoretical models we build, are tentative explanations and subject to being altered or changed with better information. That's the primary strength of the Scientific Method.

Sometimes; other times, they where just junk to begin with.... and sometimes they are junk on purpose to point out the flaws in peer review.   Politics and bias plays a role, as well of the current orthodoxy.  Or it could just be the format of your work.  The disillusionment over peer review seems to be dropping ;however, and some publications are better than others.  But I don't automatically accept or reject something just because of peer review publication (it's not the demarcation of science).  

I don't operate on blind faith of the peer review process.

But, you possess blind faith in a religion for which there is no evidence.