(April 21, 2016 at 7:26 am)Jehanne Wrote:(April 21, 2016 at 6:35 am)SteveII Wrote: Two things. First, this is another in a series of assertion that you do not back up. Secondly, cosmologist don't agree with him about what? He is examining the metaphysical ramifications of their theories. Are you saying the the cosmologist disagree with him on the metaphysical conclusions? So what? They are not not philosophers and their opinions (because that is what they are) can be examined and found wanting (which is what Craig does).
Craig earned his PhD in the Philosophy of Religion; let's just be clear about that. Secondly, the majority to most real philosophers are atheistic, and so, they are not buying Craig's arguments. Ditto for cosmologists.
Great scholars move their peers, such as Galileo and Darwin; Craig has moved no one, as far as I can tell. He has simply "confirmed" evangelical Christians in their preexisting belief system.
Your hatred of Craig is getting silly. You don't answer my questions. You just come up with more straw men and red herring fallacies (genetic fallacies, ad hominem attacks, appeal to authority, appeal to motive, argumentum ad populum, and more). Stick with God is a monster", complaining about the Bible or that the NT was a conspiracy. Leave metaphysics and Craig alone--because you don't understand them.
