(April 23, 2016 at 12:28 pm)pool the great Wrote: Absolutely. I'm completely against filling the gaps of knowledge with something as ambiguous as "God".
I also think I managed to show that even by theistic standards creationism is not possible.
It's interesting that the first three comments you got were encouraging and piled on the typical phrases that makes them happy to type. No one bothered to point out that your premises are misconceived and your reasoning is flawed.
If you want to believe that God (a first cause) is not needed, all you have to do is admit that the universe (or a predecessor) is infinite in the past--in spite that being logically absurd. If you want to "show" that creation is not possible (as you think you did) you would have to show a logical proof where the individual premises are supported and then concludes there is no God. No one has done that yet so good luck with that.
