(April 24, 2016 at 4:13 am)robvalue Wrote: Thank you, very good points
The problem with simplistic philosophical arguments that are meant to prove something about reality is they assume we do know, 100%. And the conclusions rest entirely on this being the case. But we have no way of knowing whether they are true or not, so all we have is (at best) a valid logical argument, that may or may not be sound. Often, it's not even valid though and resorts to special pleading.
Exactly.
I do like the Forum very much and I often enjoy reading you guys, really it is I who should thank you for the entertainment.
Unfortunately my time is very limited and I am not able to interact that often.
Also English is not my first language and it takes me ages to translate.
All the best.
